Wednesday, December 21, 2005

FWWM Movie Review

Okay, I'll bite, Goose. I know there are a ton of David Lynch fans in the Lodge, but I'll brave the room and bust it loose (since besides Dune, one of my favorite movies ever, I'm not a big fan of Mr. Lynch). I was flipping through my On-Demand this past Saturday and, lo and behold, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me was an option on the television. So I passed through the red curtain and clicked "watch". The film runs an excruciating 135 minutes, with maybe 40 minutes of worthy material — enough for, say, one last hour-long television time-slot. In retrospect, if only I had some plutonium and a Flux Capacitor laying around.

Fire Walk With Me is an austere, dim, disquieting, and surreal…hey it’s David Lynch and we expect nothing less. Like an acid-tongued take on the TV series he and Mark Frost originated in the early 1990’s, Director Lynch’s "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me" is an even more perplexing freak show encircling a small town’s consignment of oddities and inhabitants, and as equally visually transcendent and thematically stunning. Since I just got really wordy... In other words, it's weird.

Here's the thing. In Junior High, I was a huge Twin Peaks fan. Like most, I watched the show every week, wondering if the one-armed man was the killer, what was with the midget in the red room & why Laura Flynn-Boyle was strangely attractive. Now, of course, she's hot. Yet this movie failed to match up to the production values of the show. Watching the show again after college, it still held up. Now watching the movie at the end of the year 2005, the movie is emmensely flawed and, at times, horribly acted (Chris Isaak in particular, Kyle MacLachlan is the only one that brought anything fresh and that could equate to talent to the film). The epitomy of a disfunctional family in the Palmers was one of the few questions the film answerered halfway decent, and even that left you with a sick feeling and wanting to shower after the credits rolled. The questions raised in the show were intriguing, while the questions raised in the movie were annoying and made the script seemingly thrown together because of studio demand. Disappointing, to say the least.

I was still coming down from the effed up nature of this movie after I drove to Jimbo's Saturday night. Where did Chris Isaak go after picking up the ring? Why was David Bowie only in one scene? How did Laura not get killed earlier than at 18 after travelling in that messed up crowd for such a long time and wandering in the backwoods every other night? Mostly, I was angry at the unanswered questions and extremely disappointed overall. Mostly. And when I came back down, I wanted my 2+ hours back and wanted an apology from Mr. David Lynch.

Grade: ** out of 4 stars

7 Comments:

Blogger Goose said...

Joe.
I'll agree with you. On the surface. This is a strange, bizarre, makes no sense, what the hell, movie. But 2 things need to be known.
1) Lynch was rushed to make a Prequal to the TV Series
2) The movie was almost 3 1/2 hours long, before the studio made him cut so much that the movie made little sense.

If you really want to find out "What the Hell", find a copy of the screenplay on the web.

It explains alot of those questions.
1) Whats with David Bowie
2) The Masks
3) The Monkey
4) Chet Desmond dissappearance
5) The Angels
6) Judy and the Ring

I do have to agree it was a pretty poor stand alone movie. Any movie that gives me homework to figure out what the hell was going on...well its just too much. The beauty of the movie is the fact that there are so many theories as to what is going on.
The world of Twin Peaks has no real answers. However it can be discussed in college classes, in groups of intellectuals, or a bunch of geeks drinking coffee and eating Cherry pie.

In the end. I do end up liking the movie, not because its quality, but it adds to the chapters of character that for a time I watched as religiously as a soap opera.

Every time the credits rolled at the end of the episode, I'd already be ready for the next one.

As every show does, It jumped the shark in season two for about 4 or 5 episodes. James Hurley leaving TP and banging a gap toothed chick? Making Andy and Lucy central characters for an episode?

Yeah....It went bad. But I still watched. And while I knew who killed Laura Palmer, The world of Twin Peaks was still where I wanted to be every week.

Through the darkness of futures past, the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds: "Fire Walk With Me." We lived among the people - I think you say convenience store? We lived above it. I mean it like it is, like it sounds. My name is Mike. His name is BOB.

Thu Dec 22, 08:06:00 AM PST  
Blogger Jimbo said...

good comment Goose...on the Lodge's resident Lynch-expert...I'm with you too in that, the movie is fragmented, but still shed's more light on the beautiful creation of a world known as Twin Peaks...

I think w/o the series its not a very good stand alone film, but when used w/ the series its a good opening dialogue...plus it had Micheal J. Anderson's best scene from the whole series/movie:

"Bob, I want all my Garmenbozia"

Also Goose: do you know if there's any plans on making the full movie sometime? I think that would squash Joe 2.0's review...

Thu Dec 22, 09:07:00 AM PST  
Blogger Goose said...

There is discussion from Mark Frost (One of the writers) of a Directors cut versions. One that includes the movie in full.

Thu Dec 22, 09:26:00 AM PST  
Blogger Train said...

I would love to get my hands on the original script. I have to say I like FWWM. I much like Goose love the world of TP. Maybe it is the fact that the show started right when I was packing up to move to the great northwest I don't know but that show struck a cord with me. Part of the allure is the fact that you can take any theory from the show and branch out to anything and everything. I enjoy the openendedness ( if thats a word) lets the immagination run. How can you say that Issak was horrible in the movie. The man was playing the roll to a T. He was perfect for it. To me he seemed like a real by the book Gman.

best line... "Give Stan the Glad Hand".

and Lara Flynn Boyle was never hot... Madchen Amick, Sherilyn Fenn and Sheryl Lee were all hot in my book... I was a big Fenn fan. Something about the cherry stem did it for me.

Thu Dec 22, 10:01:00 AM PST  
Blogger Jimbo said...

good call on Amick, Fenn and Lee hotties...Fenn, might be one of the most-underrated hottie actresses of all-time...that's a fact

There's definitely a separation between the movie/series and I think that's the way it should be...I think a re-editing/extension would go a long way to change public opinion...but wtf? its Lynch...its his world...he can do what he wants...

Thu Dec 22, 10:34:00 AM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

To clarify, I said Flynn-Boyle was "strangely attractive" and that she was now "hot" (followed by a link proving my point).

And what ever happened to Fenn? She dropped off the scene faster than Jayne pre-ordering Serenity on DVD.

Thu Dec 22, 11:58:00 AM PST  
Blogger Train said...

No Flynn-Boyle is not hot, she might have had something going in the movie Threesome but now she is just one of Jack's women oh and she should think about eating some food once in awhile.

Thu Dec 22, 02:05:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

<< Home