Friday, May 19, 2006

Da Vinci was French

I went to the pre-screen with my buddy at Pacific Place. Luckily, he gets press passes so we bypassed the line which circled around all the restaurants, and then averted the disastrous line upstairs. He gave me a warning: Usually movies that pre-screen the day before official release suck. All the other movie goers had in tow with them copies of The Da Vinci Code. This book is more well read than The Holy Bible today. Its an unstoppable juggernaut that assaults the New York Time Best-Seller list and Barnes and Nobles bank account. The book maybe exciting and a fun history lesson (for things not faith based), but on film the pace is quick and the characters seem a bit contrived and definitely fabricated. From an art history nerd perspective I had a great time seeing the contrasts on the past into future models found in today, and as a Christian thinker I felt unshaken, if at all irritated, in theology. Talking with my friend about it later I told him, "I doubt that any intelligent person will walk out of that movie feeling like they finally understand God."

A big thing I felt through a lot of the movie was that Tom Hanks character Robert Langdon was really flat. He didn't get a lot of lines, and half the time he was sitting around shaking in fear or walking around. Audrey Tautou as Sophie Neveau took hold of most of the action sans the elven smile. (sidenote: the famous movie Amelie is actually an expansion of a female character from director Wong Kar Wai's 2nd story in Chungking Express) Everybody's favorite wizard Sir Ian McKellan does a fine job of being the mean old man with delusions of changing the world. If it wasn't for his magic I likely wouldn't have enjoyed the film as much. Unfortunately, our friend Leon is too professional in the film and doesn't drive through walls as we'd like to see him do. The jokes were funny, and I was also laughing at all the old women gasping loudly around me at the shock scenes. The ending goes on and on and on and on... right when you think something should be over, it goes on again, and then you think its over, you see something more. In sum, the film is 18th century French: overgrandiose, unfilling, and not as clever as you thought. Go see it for fun. And advance info on the Louvre for you, it was designed by a Chinese American architect I.M. Pei amongst hard french criticism.

***Cave Dwellers: I can also supply you with the "Good News" in addition to my spare copy of the text Da Vinci Code.

24 Comments:

Blogger Train said...

Disappointing to hear that little Opie Cunningham couldn’t come through and make a quality movie of a book that reads like a movie.

So you’re saying I should see a matinee or just wait for the DVD?

How can you under use Jean Reno, the greatest French export since the Le Car.?

Maybe Spielberg should have directed this movie

Fri May 19, 09:13:00 AM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

Yea, matinee. Might have been way better as a Spielberg film -- As always on the lodge, thats debateable.

Fri May 19, 09:16:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Soup du Jour said...

Interesting analysis, Duke. Basically what I have assumed about the movie myself. I worry that some people will swallow the historical fabrications and allow that to question their faith or accept some of the Code's assertions without seeking more information. However, if somebody is not thinking critically enough to avoid those Hollywood traps, then they have bigger problems.
I'm basically just interested in seeing the scenes from Paris, my favorite city in the world, and seeing Tom Hanks with hockey hair. I also love the girl from Amelie, and I'm a big fan of Leon the Professional (who looks like Rocky Rococo, for anybody familiar with the pizza industry in western Wisconsin).

You guys post too much. I can't keep up.

Sincerely,
Osvaldo Fernandez.

Fri May 19, 09:21:00 AM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

I would have preferred Brown's other bookAngels & Demons as a movie. The plot is more socially relevant regarding the church and theology. It features my favorite dirty city Rome.

Thanks for dropping a line Soup. I feel honored at your appearance.

Fri May 19, 09:32:00 AM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

also, if theres one shake up I see happenning from the movie its a whole bunch of women screaming "Bow down to the almighty UTERUScradle of civilization!!!!

Fri May 19, 09:37:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Train said...

Tom Hanks = Hockey Hair, That if friggin funny.

Being the history buff that I am I'm just intrigued with the Medieval Europe and the crusades. So for me this was a book I couldn’t put down. Is some of it preposterous and not fact but definitely plausible in my opinion. It feeds of every conspiracy thought I have in my head. Who wouldn’t want to believe the romanticism of Medieval Knights and protectors of the Grail?

I know next to nothing about Christianity’s history I just know what I learned in Sunday school – God is good the Devil is bad some go to heaven some go to hell. The story raises some great questions about the early church. I would love to learn more about it. So if the lodge could help me out that would be great.

I would hope it would just open people’s eyes to organized religion and get people to question what the read and hear in respective church, synagogue or mosque… I guess it all comes down to faith.

Fri May 19, 09:41:00 AM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

Well, other research believes the the knights were seeking some of Solomon's remaining treasure, which purportedly was immense. Additionally, I have several research books based on the Dead Sea Scrolls which have unknown Gospels (Gospel being a story that involves the story of Christ's ministry). A lot of these come from two sites in the middle east and some of which are known as Gnostic texts. Books of the Bible in general that are not officially accepted are known as Apocrypha and actually some Catholic Bibles include appended edtitions with Apocrypha in them. Most of these are exluded not only because of sheer heretical ideas but because ideas overlap and become redundant.

There are lots of details and additional research that is being overlooked even in the omnipotent world that is Dan Brown Da Vinci.

Tom Hanks hair really does rule in the movie.

Fri May 19, 09:54:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Jimbo said...

interesting...I can say that I've thoroughly enjoyed sitting back and watching the "debate" over this film and it's apparent "fictional" take on Gideon...I'll never read the book nor probably watch the movie...but, it always amazes me to the level of debate that people will go to when someone dictates a fictional story from a fictional story...

I'm not trying to be a hater to all my faith-believing friends in the Lodge...but the fact that a previously failed fictional writer is the cause behind critical thinking about the Catholic Church is ironic and fitting...

I do commend Dan Brown for at least bringing discussion to the American Populous, but I think we're going to have to move beyond mixing CSI and the Bible for us to get to any real honest discussion...

I've felt for a long time that belief or faith in the bible doesn't excuse you from thinking critically...lord, I was born a ramblin' man

Fri May 19, 09:56:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Jimbo said...

also, I love it when Duke goes old-testament-wrath-of-god on us...

Fri May 19, 09:59:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Train said...

yes, like the question submitted by C. Everett of Seattle, WA

Why are there no Dinosaurs in the bible?

Fri May 19, 10:04:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Jimbo said...

never existed you hear me...lies...why else is the Natural Mueseum free?...because no one would pay for lies...

Fri May 19, 10:10:00 AM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

And lets not forget when the Ark of the Covenant was stolen Nazis who were really part of Buddhist plan of world domination.

Fri May 19, 11:05:00 AM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

Also, i am not part of the conservative fundamentalist christian crowd that sticks to holding onto the old testament. but i am a believer in God that seeks to be empowered by Grace and knowledge.

The discussion of Church as an unwavering unthinking behemoth is not the only problem. The bigger problem is educating people to consider things beyond right & wrong, and to think overall. The pinnings of serious thought into the nature of God beyond popular thought and cynicism is a throwback. All aspects of culture across time, and a representative of human nature, have allowed for the idea of something spiritual beyond themselves.

Scientists of the middle and victorian ages did not seek to debunk God, but to understand the nature of his being the natural investigation. Darwin - devout Christian. Newton - devout Christian. Einstein - "I seek to think how God thinks." Science was meant as an additional tool in our thought to combine together the natural spiritual further.

There are aspects of faith that we have indoctrinated from contemplation that are not clearly spelled out anywhere. "Trinity" is never spoken in the gospel. God as a "multiple being" is unheard of. Science as a "unifier" of Grace is unspeakable.

Fri May 19, 11:17:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Jimbo said...

Duke, this may need to go off-line soon for fear of breaking the secular rules of the Lodge, but I love the discussion, and you bring passion and honesty to your beliefs...

Occam's Razor is a very interesting element in this debate and what effect the role of science and faith have on each other...the origins of the middle-ages combined the two, whereas now you see a seperatism between the two factions that forces people to choose either a 'scientific' or 'relgious-based' rationale for many of the nature's occurrances...

I'm curious to get your response Duke to , (and I believe you've probably answered this in your comments), whether you think that science and religion will ever operate with the same inclusion as they did in the middle-ages, where the greatest science minds of the times were faith-bearing men?

Fri May 19, 12:03:00 PM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

Much like Professor X, I do believe the Homo-Superior and Homo-Sapiens can coexist. And I do have press passes for Xmen3 again on Monday.

Fri May 19, 12:43:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Unknown said...

Just got back from a company meeting... wow.

First off... Devin, Amelie is not an expansion of a Chungking Express character. Jean-Pierre Jeunet (Amelie's writer and director) originally started collecting the stories and memories that make up the story in 1974. I felt the need to defend a truly original and amazing movie like Amelie there.

Secondly, I'm not going to comment on the historical and theological accuracy of The DaVinci Code. But if you guys want to talk about it offline, I'll be more than willing to explain the truths and lies behind the "facts" Brown claims in the book.

And finally... Soup, your "hockey hair" line killed me & I don't think Carl Everett's dinosaur debate will ever get old to me.

Fri May 19, 01:27:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Unknown said...

Oh yeah, and I.M.Pei redesigned the Louvre Museum... which included the pyramid structure as the new entrance that is in the novel.

Fri May 19, 01:36:00 PM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

Faye Wong's character sneaks around this cop stalking him at various chances and sneaking into his place and rearranging his life without knowing it - she has a crush on him. That is oddly familiar and Jeunet & Wong both work in the same film circles. Although Jeunet may have been collecting stories used in Amelie, i feel that Wong's female character may have been the catalyst.

Fri May 19, 01:37:00 PM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

If you see the movie, you'll realize after I referenced Pei as significant towards the Pyramid. Dutch are Chinamen haters too.

Fri May 19, 01:39:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Goose said...

This looks like a "go see the movie and then have a lodge meeting to discuss".

Fri May 19, 02:03:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Train said...

Goose, I am up for seeing the movie when you get back. Let me know if you want to get together... This is also open to all lodge members.

Fri May 19, 02:28:00 PM PDT  
Blogger theDUKE said...

Where's MCP at? He was supposed to be at the screening too.

Fri May 19, 02:49:00 PM PDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MCP was a the screening but he is on vacation so I'm sure he is doing whatever dorks do while on vacation

Fri May 19, 02:56:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Unknown said...

You would know, Train. What do dorks do on vacation?

Fri May 19, 03:01:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment

<< Home